The Hidden Cost of Teacher Workload: Constant Switching Between Systems

Soojin Kim 11 May 20263 min read
illustration of teachers with multiple systems

When conversations around teacher workload happen, the focus is often placed on volume.

Too many reports.
Too much marking.
Too much planning.
Too many platforms.

But one of the less visible pressures in teaching is the constant switching between tasks and systems throughout the day.

Planning lessons.
Reviewing student work.
Tracking progress.
Responding to submissions.
Writing reports.
Preparing feedback.

Individually, each task may seem manageable.

Together, however, they can create a fragmented workflow that increases mental load and reduces time for actual teaching.

In many schools, teachers are expected to move between multiple systems to complete a normal week’s work.

A lesson may begin on one platform.
Feedback may happen in another.
Progress tracking somewhere else.
Reporting in an entirely separate space.

Over time, that constant context-switching can become exhausting.


The Problem Is Not Always One Big Task

Teacher workload rarely comes from one overwhelming responsibility.

More often, it builds gradually through repeated interruptions, duplicated processes, and admin-heavy routines.

Even small actions can accumulate:

  • Re-entering similar information across systems

  • Switching tabs and platforms repeatedly

  • Manually organising resources

  • Rewriting similar feedback

  • Searching for student progress information across multiple tools

These tasks may appear minor individually, but together they can consume significant time and energy.

This is one reason why conversations around workload should not only focus on reducing tasks, but also on improving workflow.


Why Workflow Design Matters

Technology in education is often discussed in terms of features.

But for many teachers, the real question is simpler:

Does this make the day feel smoother or more fragmented?

A connected workflow can reduce friction.

Not by replacing teachers, but by reducing repetitive admin and making everyday processes easier to manage.

This becomes especially important during periods such as:

  • exam season

  • end-of-term reporting

  • lesson preparation cycles

  • assessment periods

  • progress reviews

At those times, even small inefficiencies can quickly become stressful.


A Walkthrough of Dolly’s Connected Workflow

Dolly preview of connected workflow

We recently recorded a short walkthrough showing how Dolly connects different parts of the teaching workflow into one system.

The walkthrough includes:

  • curriculum planning

  • marking workflows

  • feedback support

  • progress insights

  • reporting support

Rather than functioning as isolated tools, the goal is to bring these processes together into one connected flow.

Watch the walkthrough here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdM2j7ttilQ

You can also learn more about Dolly and join at:

https://godolly.ai


Supporting Teachers, Not Replacing Them

One of the most important conversations in EdTech right now is how technology should support teachers.

The goal should not simply be to add more tools into classrooms.

It should be to reduce unnecessary friction.

Teachers already manage enormous amounts of emotional, organisational, and administrative responsibility.

When systems are designed around real classroom workflows, technology becomes less about automation for its own sake and more about creating space for teaching, feedback, and student support.

That is ultimately where many educators want to spend their time.

Not switching endlessly between systems.

But focusing on students.